Still on Dr Blanchard, the lady who was Peer Reviewed To Death.
Webmaster@lsumcbytes" wrote:
Okay, so how does this benefit our patients?
We take a woman who had a talent for treating and preventing pre-term labor and delivery, and we peer-review her literally to death. And then we review our nationwide statistics and determine that although women are seeing doctors much more often for prenatal care these days, the rate of pre-term delivery is actually GOING UP!!!
How does this figure? Are we to deduce that doctors want access to patients TO MAKE MONEY, and then don't really care if they do a good job or not? And perhaps, if you do TOO good a job and get better statistics than they do, THEY GO AFTER YOU, because you give them too much competition???
Lawyers tell me to "follow the money" to figure out the animus behind "stuff". Well, what does this look like?
|
Report Mixed on Babies' Health Mothers More Likely To Get Prenatal Care, but Birth Weights Drop By LAURA MECKLER, .c The Associated Press WASHINGTON (Feb. 20) - Pregnant women were more likely to see a doctor but less likely to be married. They were less likely to smoke, but their babies were more likely to arrive too early. It was a mixed bag for babies in the 1990s, when there were improvements in several measures that help predict children's well-being, but setbacks too. ''Conditions at birth often reflect the forces that will shape a young person's life,'' said a report released Tuesday, ''The Right Start,'' produced by Child Trends, a research firm, and Kids Count, a project that produces an annual survey of child well-being. The report, which examined trends from 1990 to 1998 in the 50 states and 50 largest cities, said progress varied widely. Differences may be related to socio-economic, demographic and economic factors, with children born to poor women and racial minorities facing greater risks than other new mothers. The nation overall made more progress during the 1990s than did large cities, which lagged behind in almost every measure. And researchers noted wide variability. In Dallas, for instance, the portion of pregnant women who failed to get important prenatal care by their second trimester dropped from 17 percent to 5 percent between 1990 and 1998. Meanwhile, in Columbus, Ohio, it increased from 4 percent to 12 percent. ''If you were Columbus, you'd say, 'What are they doing in Dallas?''' said Richard Wertheimer, a senior researcher at Child Trends. ''If the cities can figure out what works, they may have an opportunity to improve.'' Nationally, the report found progress on several measures:
The nation lost ground on other measures:
Researchers limited their report to statistics gathered on birth certificates, which allowed for analysis of cities. But that meant sometimes passing over more telling data only available for states and the nation. For instance, the report found only modest progress in the portion of all births to teen-agers. That's because while teen births have been dropping, so have births to older women. A better measure, experts agree, is the portion of all teens who give birth in any one year, and by that score, there's been considerable improvement. Births to girls age 15-17 fell 18 percent between 1991 and 1998, hitting a 40-year low. Differences among states often are related to racial makeup, the report said. On all measures except smoking, whites did best and blacks worst, with Hispanics in between. Researchers note that these racial gaps have deeper roots explained by differences in education, income and availability of high-quality services. AP-NY-02-20-01 0603EST |