Posted to Newsflash Podiatry ONLINE, 5/19/2000 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| LETTERS ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| From: Frank J. Lattarulo, DPM Subj: Dr Gale and the NON-SUPPORT OF THE APMA Dr Gale could not be more right on about the LACK of noise from the APMA. What are they afraid of? Do they have an opinion about all this? Where do they stand? Their silence on this issue is deafening. How about it Ron--what do YOU think. Thousands of members are waiting to hear from you. Can't hear you. Frank J. Lattarulo, DPM Tapan Zee Division Doclatt@aol.com New York, New York _____________________________ From: Gerald S. Campo, DPM Subj: APMA and Dr. Gale While I agree that the APMA should proceed cautiously regarding individual legal issues I feel that it is incumbent on the APMA to look into Dr. Gale's case. Acting as an independent 3rd party the APMA needs to review this case because it involves the integrity of one of its state components. Unfortunately, North Dakota is a small component but a problem of this magnitude cannot be ignored. Gerald S. Campo, DPM CampoNY@aol.com